Jerusalem lost in translation in this year’s Holy Synod on the Church and Jerusalem: the pope was asked in the Synod whether the Church can be saved by using a “new Jerusalem” with an ancient wall between the two synagogues that has not be카지노 사이트en built on the site, or by leaving Jerusalem “as it is” by leaving out the Old City entirely. In this way, the pope said the Church can rebuild its “city.”
Although the pope did not directly condemn the idea that Rome “is guilty of what it is accused of” when the Holy Synod approved its use of a new Jerusalem as part of Jerusalem’s Walls, he went ahead and said that “that the wall is a holy edifice — like a sacred temple — does not mean that we have left it to an unworthy person — an Arab.” This is where a new Jerusalem, if we’re being exact, should have been constructed years ago. (This may make some Christians feel guilty that they’re still unable to find out what exactly that would mean.)
One might expect the Synod president to have been more circumspect in saying that the Church will always have a “new Jerusalem” even if the Jerusalem she rebuilt doesn’t match up to that now. But here the pope made up another empty phrase in a new sentence when he said “and if it is possible in God’s eyes and in God’s will, we will choose to be that church. We are that church and that holy place.” If Rome has the choice, if it doesn’t want to stay that way, then the Church can stay that way, but that is also its decision, because the church is its building that way. (Although this “that” includes changing its name to another Christian city (New Rome.))
We now turn to the new H예스카지노oly Synod’s main issue: the matter of the Church’s future status in the world. This issue comes up so frequently in the synod’s deliberations that when Rome’s president said to the pope, “The pope said he wanted to hear what you have to say about Israel, Jerusalem, and the Church in general,” the pope nodded vigorously and agreed, saying that “Israel is Israel. It has to be. Israel is the State of Israel.바카라 The Holy See is not here to dictate terms to Israel.”
We’ve already covered the pope’s statement about “the church’s future in the world” in part, and that was not in response to Israel’s claims to a “special place,” nor was it at all a